CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL · R&D LEADERSHIP
May 2026

R&D Led by Ferdinando
Cycle 25-26

Department Review

A focused view of the R&D team's performance across Cycle 25-26 — individual results, competency profiles, and how the team positions relative to the broader PI AgSciences Brazil benchmark.

2
Team members
3.53
Department mean
4.15
Top rating
1
Sub-regions
01 · Department Overview

R&D at a glance.

How the team is delivering across Cycle 25-26 — the shape of performance, the strongest competencies, and how the department positions in the broader company context.

Department mean
3.53/ 5.00
σ = 0.87 · n = 2
Exceeds (≥4.0)
1
Top-quartile contributors
Meets (3.0–4.0)
0
Solid delivery backbone
Positioning
101.7%
of company mean · at company pace
Where R&D sits vs. the company
Visual comparison of average Overall rating. Each dot is anonymized — no individual comparison, just the team's general position.
1.02.03.04.05.0
Company
3.47
R&D
3.53
BuildingApproachingMeetingExceeding

Overall Rating distribution

Where R&D team members land on the rating scale.

0
0.0
0
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.5
0
2.0
1
2.5
0
3.0
0
3.5
1
4.0
0
4.5

Competency strengths

R&D profile ranked from strongest to weakest competency.

01 Customer Service
Dept
4.50
Company
3.64
124% of company
02 Problem Solving
Dept
4.00
Company
3.64
110% of company
03 Planning & Organization
Dept
3.50
Company
3.56
98% of company
04 Teamwork
Dept
3.50
Company
3.72
94% of company
05 Communications
Dept
3.00
Company
3.28
92% of company
06 Adaptability
Dept
2.50
Company
3.59
70% of company
02 · Team

Every review, one card.

Click any card for the full profile — competencies, goals, job duties, narrative comments, and general information including current compensation.

DD

Diego Mateus Desbesell

R&D Agronomist
R&D · R&D
TOP IN DEPT
4.15
4.25 G 4.00 JD 4.17 C
120% of company mean
MS

Mário Onishi Shirakawa

Research & Devevopment Agronomist
R&D · R&D
2.92
3.00 G 3.00 JD 2.83 C
84% of company mean
03 · Positioning

How each team member sits in context.

For each person: where they land on the 1–5 rating scale, with reference lines for R&D mean (solid colored line) and Company mean (dashed grey). The % value shows proximity to the company average — not a ranking. The goal is context, not competition.

R&D mean (3.53)
Company mean (3.47)
Individual rating
DD
Diego Mateus Desbesell
R&D Agronomist
4.15
120%
of company avg
MS
Mário Onishi Shirakawa
Research & Devevopment Agronomist
2.92
84%
of company avg
💡 How to read this A proximity of 100% means the person is right at the company average. Above 100% indicates delivery above the company-wide benchmark, below 100% indicates ratings below it. This is not a judgment — it is calibration context. The distribution of the R&D team naturally produces a mix above and below the company mean.
04 · Salary Adjustments

Salary adjustments.

No salary adjustments were applied in Cycle 26-27 for this team.

05 · Action Plan

Start · Stop · Continue framework

Define and track action items for each team member. Use the Start/Stop/Continue framework to capture what behaviors should begin, end, or be reinforced. Items persist on this device — to share progress, use Export CSV.